|
|
Post by mellman on Dec 9, 2023 15:13:56 GMT -5
Here they are, the cream of the crop from both Conferences - who's winning in a game between these two? |
|
|
|
Post by ManWithNoName on Dec 9, 2023 16:26:23 GMT -5
First look I’d have to go with the AFC. Like the offensive talent a little better.
|
|
|
|
Post by hildebrand on Dec 9, 2023 17:43:00 GMT -5
AFC generally looks better. Better RB and WRs. Defensively, the AFC DEs performed much better this year than the NFC DEs.
If we want OL scoring to be similar to a fantasy style, I think we need to come up with a weighting system for KRB, KRO, and sacks allowed. I could see this getting skewed towards run or pass system bias until we figure out a balanced weighting. Otherwise, I think a weighting of KRB%, OPct, and Sack% might work.
|
|
|
|
Post by bylanta on Dec 9, 2023 18:19:39 GMT -5
AFC generally looks better. Better RB and WRs. Defensively, the AFC DEs performed much better this year than the NFC DEs. If we want OL scoring to be similar to a fantasy style, I think we need to come up with a weighting system for KRB, KRO, and sacks allowed. I could see this getting skewed towards run or pass system bias until we figure out a balanced weighting. Otherwise, I think a weighting of KRB%, OPct, and Sack% might work. 100% weight to run blk% obviously. |
|
|
|
Post by clown on Dec 9, 2023 18:42:14 GMT -5
AFC generally looks better. Better RB  |
|
|
|
Post by hildebrand on Dec 9, 2023 18:49:03 GMT -5
AFC generally looks better. Better RB and WRs. Defensively, the AFC DEs performed much better this year than the NFC DEs. If we want OL scoring to be similar to a fantasy style, I think we need to come up with a weighting system for KRB, KRO, and sacks allowed. I could see this getting skewed towards run or pass system bias until we figure out a balanced weighting. Otherwise, I think a weighting of KRB%, OPct, and Sack% might work. 100% weight to run blk% obviously. There's more to a good OL than pushing tushes. |
|
