|
Post by clown on Jan 4, 2024 10:42:40 GMT -5
Marcos Fordham -WR check those combines---I think he is friends with Lawrence Perry
|
|
|
Post by ManWithNoName on Jan 5, 2024 0:48:02 GMT -5
Yikes, not exactly living up to how he looked pre-draft. Still, he looks like a decent WR despite the low overall. Wouldn't hate him as my 3rd WR.
|
|
|
Post by mellman on Jan 5, 2024 6:00:18 GMT -5
I don't have a conscriptor screenshot of that RB I took last year but he bombed probably the worst I've had so far in FOF.
|
|
|
Post by clown on Jan 5, 2024 12:16:07 GMT -5
I don't have a conscriptor screenshot of that RB I took last year but he bombed probably the worst I've had so far in FOF.
|
|
|
Post by clown on Jan 5, 2024 12:18:04 GMT -5
We all are going to learn how to predict a bust. Clown is on a mission! Please join me!
|
|
|
Post by Bighouserulez on Jan 5, 2024 13:32:35 GMT -5
We all are going to learn how to predict a bust. Clown is on a mission! Please join me! YOu cannot always predict a bust man lol. If you draft the same guy 7/10 times he ends up different in the long run. IN HINDSIGHT- Fordham- 36 sole with 85 intell does not match up at all. As soon as i saw that on the roster i have to think he is going to dive. You had a ton of vol at 89 so the static tells a tale here. YOu saw 26 BP from your scout worst case and he dropped to 0. That matches the drops along the way on the other bars. Quick glance of your guy static bar is too low, initially that pulls up my question as to what the F is Jim trying to show me here. OK so if a 4.49 40 should be 56-66 BP why am i only seeing 30 ish BP.... YOU got what you drafted just a 20% less player then you thought you were going to get. Your best case scenario based on bars, guesswork , combines i would have put him at 48 rated in my DA Was he worth the pick? I would have said yes almost any one of us would have looked at him in the 1st round. WRs are too hard to pass on for sure. OK so back to day one Clown is in his Jammies with Mrs. Clown showing his player profiles. Let her know that you have a less then marginal static, with an overinflated GD and RR bar based on his intel and Sole, then tell her that there is 89 vol in the big picture. I am sure she would tell you to double check your numbers.
|
|
|
Post by Joel on Jan 5, 2024 13:35:34 GMT -5
Just looks like a bad vol hit to me. Always remember nick saying the static never lies. So for it to now be 0, it has to be vol
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy Johnson on Jan 5, 2024 13:44:22 GMT -5
Too many to name. Pretty much roughly 97% of all of my draftees. I am trash. FUCK THE DRAFT!
|
|
|
Post by Bighouserulez on Jan 5, 2024 13:49:39 GMT -5
I don't have a conscriptor screenshot of that RB I took last year but he bombed probably the worst I've had so far in FOF. OK i have not looked at this guy in game now at all. Statics check the boxes here 4.47 should be like 65-75 speed. OK so we are fine if that comes out that high for a first box checked. My next thing is wow that S2O is really high too he should be pretty good and not scared of this pick based on statics. Next ok what stands out to me that is clear is that HR. I see 71 and i am excited but wait that comes down to the SOle(along with RR which is also out of wack a bit) OK not i have a red flag on this guy. Without knowing his intel at this point he should have 37 ish HR and maybe 40 ish RR. Maybe this is higher due to the statics ok i can see that but i am relying a TON on just statics when the info on the statics even tells me a little is off. With those combines i show he should be 125 max combined on those two and we are over that by a bit. Again a little red flag for me. Let's dig a little deeper ok the bench is PI right? So 21 reps puts me in the 40 ish area..ok i am leaning towards this guy being more of a risk and dropping some then gaining or holding because everything is telling me something here. I am doing this blind here no clue what Mellman's Rb ended up being but looks like a 45 rated RB if he matches the combines. oddly lol here is a like player to him(philly UDFA) with very like combines. Kyle Hoover has very close combines - therzb.com/RZB/fof_draft/show_player.php?in_game_id=39844statics 77/59 ok about the same right 4/7 HR 64 PI 32 rated RB
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy Johnson on Jan 5, 2024 14:32:02 GMT -5
OK i have not looked at this guy in game now at all. Statics check the boxes here 4.47 should be like 65-75 speed. OK so we are fine if that comes out that high for a first box checked. My next thing is wow that S2O is really high too he should be pretty good and not scared of this pick based on statics. Next ok what stands out to me that is clear is that HR. I see 71 and i am excited but wait that comes down to the SOle(along with RR which is also out of wack a bit) OK not i have a red flag on this guy. Without knowing his intel at this point he should have 37 ish HR and maybe 40 ish RR. Maybe this is higher due to the statics ok i can see that but i am relying a TON on just statics when the info on the statics even tells me a little is off. With those combines i show he should be 125 max combined on those two and we are over that by a bit. Again a little red flag for me. Let's dig a little deeper ok the bench is PI right? So 21 reps puts me in the 40 ish area..ok i am leaning towards this guy being more of a risk and dropping some then gaining or holding because everything is telling me something here. I am doing this blind here no clue what Mellman's Rb ended up being but looks like a 45 rated RB if he matches the combines. oddly lol here is a like player to him(philly UDFA) with very like combines. Kyle Hoover has very close combines - therzb.com/RZB/fof_draft/show_player.php?in_game_id=39844statics 77/59 ok about the same right 4/7 HR 64 PI 32 rated RB This makes my head hurt. Information overload.
|
|
|
Post by ezlee2 on Jan 5, 2024 14:58:53 GMT -5
Just looks like a bad vol hit to me. Always remember nick saying the static never lies. So for it to now be 0, it has to be vol I have pretty much lived by this and it's served me very well over the years.
|
|
|
Post by Bighouserulez on Jan 5, 2024 15:37:12 GMT -5
Just looks like a bad vol hit to me. Always remember nick saying the static never lies. So for it to now be 0, it has to be vol I have pretty much lived by this and it's served me very well over the years. I hear you of course on this one but explain to me Mellman's guy. There are signs that people often forget to look at. 0 bars that hurts your draftees. If you have a 0 bar and it does not match the combine....Pay attention dude is probably going to drop. Combines matter in leagues where the settings are correct. That even plays in with statics being in the same line. If the statics do not match that is fine..but if the other combines are less then stellar watch for something less then magic to happen. I hear Gms grabbing guys with statics(Look at my Cb Hopper i took this year) his static is higher and the combines show this guy is going to explode. He has a zero bar i am highly doubtful anything happens more then a few ticks. The great thing about FOF is there is no direct for sure yes.....There are things to help you lean one way or another but ideally it comes down to partial judgement calls, using your gut, and reading tells.
|
|
|
Post by mellman on Jan 5, 2024 15:47:48 GMT -5
OK i have not looked at this guy in game now at all. Statics check the boxes here 4.47 should be like 65-75 speed. OK so we are fine if that comes out that high for a first box checked. My next thing is wow that S2O is really high too he should be pretty good and not scared of this pick based on statics. Next ok what stands out to me that is clear is that HR. I see 71 and i am excited but wait that comes down to the SOle(along with RR which is also out of wack a bit) OK not i have a red flag on this guy. Without knowing his intel at this point he should have 37 ish HR and maybe 40 ish RR. Maybe this is higher due to the statics ok i can see that but i am relying a TON on just statics when the info on the statics even tells me a little is off. With those combines i show he should be 125 max combined on those two and we are over that by a bit. Again a little red flag for me. Let's dig a little deeper ok the bench is PI right? So 21 reps puts me in the 40 ish area..ok i am leaning towards this guy being more of a risk and dropping some then gaining or holding because everything is telling me something here. I am doing this blind here no clue what Mellman's Rb ended up being but looks like a 45 rated RB if he matches the combines. oddly lol here is a like player to him(philly UDFA) with very like combines. Kyle Hoover has very close combines - therzb.com/RZB/fof_draft/show_player.php?in_game_id=39844statics 77/59 ok about the same right 4/7 HR 64 PI 32 rated RB Thanks for the insight man, I figured partly with statics that if for instance his Power Inside was HIGHER than it should have been based on his bench combine, then that would be a positive sign. That didn't really factor into my thinking at the time but is more just a rule of thumb because I didn't feel like this guy was a risky pick in general. You won't find him in game because he's flipping burgers and bumming smokes off his co-workers now as he dropped to somewhere in the mid teens in both ovr and fut I think. What does this bit mean, 125 max what? Edit - i found him in the draft history
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy Johnson on Jan 5, 2024 16:00:27 GMT -5
Considering his breakaway, power inside and speed to the outside (all statics) all died...I would say this was a VSOD.
|
|
|
Post by clown on Jan 5, 2024 16:17:50 GMT -5
I would draft THAT RB 100/100 TIMES
|
|