|
|
Post by king171717 on Jun 3, 2016 16:17:41 GMT -5
1.25 - Indianapolis - RB - Gary Jung, MassachusettsPro's: Jung, I think, is the best back in the draft. He's got great vision to see the hole. His quickness gets him around the corner. Game film showed him very effective on 3rd downs and as a receiving threat out of the backfield. His endurance is good, so he can be an every down back. Con's: Jung doesn't have North/South speed. He's more of an East/West runner. So once he gets in the open, he's easy to catch. Overall: The Colts have a pair of decent RB's now with Murray and Anglewicz, so adding Jung makes this a crowded backfield. Still, I like the pick. Jung should be a star. Grade: A+ I need to do a shout out for sawblade for helping me take jung. I am really excited for Jung and with Murray getting older I really wanted another rb for the future. Now Jung can be groomed behind Murray and a great oline. Thank you for doing these picks  |
|
|
|
Post by freddylamar on Jun 3, 2016 16:35:13 GMT -5
1.25 - Indianapolis - RB - Gary Jung, MassachusettsPro's: Jung, I think, is the best back in the draft. He's got great vision to see the hole. His quickness gets him around the corner. Game film showed him very effective on 3rd downs and as a receiving threat out of the backfield. His endurance is good, so he can be an every down back. Con's: Jung doesn't have North/South speed. He's more of an East/West runner. So once he gets in the open, he's easy to catch. Overall: The Colts have a pair of decent RB's now with Murray and Anglewicz, so adding Jung makes this a crowded backfield. Still, I like the pick. Jung should be a star. Grade: A+ I need to do a shout out for sawblade for helping me take jung. I am really excited for Jung and with Murray getting older I really wanted another rb for the future. Now Jung can be groomed behind Murray and a great oline. Thank you for doing these picks I'm surprised he slipped so far. I think he's a very solid looking back. I kept checking back on the draft the last two days wondering if I missed something. I could have sworn he'd be a top 10 back. We had him VU and he was one of three players we considered at 1.7. Great pick! |
|
|
|
Post by Strubbel94 on Jun 3, 2016 17:04:15 GMT -5
I need to do a shout out for sawblade for helping me take jung. I am really excited for Jung and with Murray getting older I really wanted another rb for the future. Now Jung can be groomed behind Murray and a great oline. Thank you for doing these picks I'm surprised he slipped so far. I think he's a very solid looking back. I kept checking back on the draft the last two days wondering if I missed something. I could have sworn he'd be a top 10 back. We had him VU and he was one of three players we considered at 1.7. Great pick! I have him VO and his bars chrashed for my scouts, they had him at just average at best. But: I hope he will turn out as very solid back for you and as 2nd best RB of this draft class |
|
|
|
Post by timmynausea on Jun 3, 2016 17:46:11 GMT -5
Yeah, Jung's bars looked much weaker after an interview for me, too. He could still be productive, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by schwantz on Jun 3, 2016 19:08:19 GMT -5
Yeah, Jung's bars looked much weaker after an interview for me, too. He could still be productive, though. Yeah, I was going to take Jung at 1.23, but interview had VO and bars crashed the same as others. |
|
|
|
Post by ManWithNoName on Jun 3, 2016 19:12:05 GMT -5
Great job doing the Draft grades Not Timmy. Was very interesting to read, although I think you need to be a little meaner with your grades.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sawblade300 on Jun 3, 2016 20:03:17 GMT -5
I think it would be interesting when Timmy gets the time, for him to go through and see what he would have graded 1st round. Just to see how different it may be from Mayock.
|
|
|
|
Post by julioriddols on Jun 4, 2016 2:59:40 GMT -5
1.25 - Indianapolis - RB - Gary Jung, MassachusettsPro's: Jung, I think, is the best back in the draft. He's got great vision to see the hole. His quickness gets him around the corner. Game film showed him very effective on 3rd downs and as a receiving threat out of the backfield. His endurance is good, so he can be an every down back. Con's: Jung doesn't have North/South speed. He's more of an East/West runner. So once he gets in the open, he's easy to catch. Overall: The Colts have a pair of decent RB's now with Murray and Anglewicz, so adding Jung makes this a crowded backfield. Still, I like the pick. Jung should be a star. Grade: A+ Jung is who I would have taken if I wasn't a bonehead and completely missed the first 20 picks of the draft. |
|
|
|
Post by davehibb on Jun 4, 2016 5:06:41 GMT -5
Great work Mr Mayock!
Much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Post by scorp on Jun 4, 2016 14:01:56 GMT -5
Great work Mayock, thanks for doing this.
|
|
