|
|
Post by Nick on May 29, 2020 1:50:11 GMT -5
Thanks for this Jamie, great contribution.
I got an A+ plus for Russell and an estimated rating of 34 overall. Even more uncertain about him now lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefatcat on May 29, 2020 2:09:12 GMT -5
max you grade about C+ on average so you are middle of the pack! Well I know these grades doesn't mean much, but as you're using these rankings to diss me let me open your eyes. I'm in 2nd place in these rankings. I know you hae a pblem with me, but you should attack me more intelligent or just stop it. I reckon that would most appropiate, thanks :* what are you going on about! Were am i dissing you here?  ?
You have 2 C+ which means average you have 4 x D below average you have 4 x B above average (so they cancel out the "D"s) you have 2 A's
Add that together divide by 10 and your just above a C+ which is apparently average. Where do you get your 2nd from?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on May 29, 2020 2:09:17 GMT -5
Even more curious is that the other QB I took in the 3rd I got a C for. Yet he was 35 overall. I wonder why the grades are so different?
|
|
|
|
Post by thefatcat on May 29, 2020 2:11:15 GMT -5
Thanks for this Jamie, great contribution. I got an A+ plus for Russell and an estimated rating of 34 overall. Even more uncertain about him now lol. I basically gave 0.5 points per grade above C+ and -0.5 points per grade below C+ then divided the total by the number of players you picked and shockingly Nick you came out top! |
|
|
|
Post by squirrel on May 29, 2020 2:56:07 GMT -5
Just bar pattern I think. Not sure I agree with it
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on May 29, 2020 2:57:10 GMT -5
My 2 main picks are all about how the AI comes out. Don't think the utility would know that any better than me. We will see. The WRs look good value picks to me, but nothing special.
|
|
|
|
Post by squirrel on May 29, 2020 11:45:26 GMT -5
The evaluation on the 1.2 QB to DET was really wrong by the looks of it - looks like a great pick so far.
Broadly though I’m happy with these grades based on the reveals so far. Would be good to know if there are any others that look really wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by sef0r on May 29, 2020 17:48:33 GMT -5
The evaluation on the 1.2 QB to DET was really wrong by the looks of it - looks like a great pick so far. Broadly though I’m happy with these grades based on the reveals so far. Would be good to know if there are any others that look really wrong
It's still early, my scout only sees him 22/63 which is on the low end of recent top QB picks this high (I assume)
Does your spreadsheet have a large database of draft info and how the players eventually turned out right? How many seasons of each player does it record, the first 4 or until they retire?
I assume it's based on the player going until they retire, and based on previous draft picks with similar combines and bar combinations, Willis probably fits into the 2 out of 10 players of similar build ending up not playing well...
Or I could be totally wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by ezlee2 on May 29, 2020 17:50:53 GMT -5
Really appreciate this effort Jamie!
|
|
? 
