|
|
Post by rush27 on Jan 31, 2017 11:14:05 GMT -5
I say it's still a good pick. I think we have just been spoilt by the two QB's last year. Not very good at guessing on an overall rating here but he looks to be a franchise QB for sure
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Jan 31, 2017 11:16:28 GMT -5
Defense is DC. HC is chiefly about motivation and discipline. Overall performance and penalties in other words.
The interview bar is to do with accuracy of the interview results and the width of the bars you see. Scouting ability is the pure accuracy of the bars you see. So as Rush has the OC with the best SA, he has the best view of this player. Coldheat's guys impression is more likely to be right as his interview bar is higher.
Having said all of this I would take a 65 rated QB over any RB or non skill player, so I still think your pick is good.
|
|
|
|
Post by TAFIV on Jan 31, 2017 11:17:44 GMT -5
from the help file
|
|
|
|
Post by TAFIV on Jan 31, 2017 11:20:16 GMT -5
and even if he does drop to 65 that's still a great QB so i'll be happy
|
|
|
|
Post by TAFIV on Jan 31, 2017 11:21:45 GMT -5
also notice that rush still has him way up there he's at the 1.6 pick in the mock draft
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Jan 31, 2017 11:23:18 GMT -5
Yes. So HC for the VO or VU stuff. In this case OC's SA for the accuracy of the bars.
It says bigger role, but we found it is like 80-90%. So much bigger role.
The difference between what a excellent OC can see and a poor OC can be huge. We stumbled into this when people were raving about this QB who we thought was crap. Our OCs SA were poor, so our view was totally inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Jan 31, 2017 11:27:25 GMT -5
also notice that rush still has him way up there he's at the 1.6 pick in the mock draft Oh yeah, definately no need to panic. When I first saw this guy I was thinking 75 or so. If Rush thought he was going to be that good he would of had him at 1.1 I am sure. I am only guessing anyway. No need to put too much stock in what I am saying. But when you know exactly how scouting works and what does what, it is interesting. We all get so hooked up on what we see on our screen. It is easy to forget it is only a scouts view. Everyone is seeing something a little different. Even a lot different. |
|
|
|
Post by coldheat on Jan 31, 2017 11:37:14 GMT -5
also notice that rush still has him way up there he's at the 1.6 pick in the mock draft Yes I think he will be good. Remember I did not want to gamble since I have a 65ish QB already...otherwise I would have taken him! |
|
|
|
Post by TAFIV on Jan 31, 2017 11:46:07 GMT -5
yeah the main reason i grabbed him is because even though Wilson is a 78 rated QB he's also 33 years old and a mentor so he can train my new guy for the next year or so before he retires on me
|
|
|
|
Post by rush27 on Jan 31, 2017 11:46:40 GMT -5
I had the Browns taking RB because they have Hawks. Otherwise, a top QB almost always goes 1.1. I probably stick to my guns with the other QB though, lol!
|
|
